Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Research & Studies

Science at Risk – iASK Workshop

 

The workshop has been dedicated to selected problems concerning risks and dangers that emerge in science and its wider context. The contributions treated different aspects of the topics, including the phenomenon of hostility to science, the economization of education and scientific research, credulity, and the idea of Bildung. Günther Fleck discussed various aspects of anti-science, especially the refusal of standard scientific research based on ideology and group interests. He described various enemies of science both from the inside and from the outside. György Csepeli explored the psychological features and social determinants of credulity.

He treated the complex framework in which the role of science changed with the world’s becoming more and more complex and the emergence of new social media. The talk emphasized the loss of authority of elites in general, and of scientific elites in particular, and, consequently, the need for raising an understanding for science in the wider public.

László Ropolyi gave an overview of different major approaches to knowledge in three larger periods of human history: human knowledge – useful knowledge – free knowledge. The talk elaborated in detail the difference between the knowledge of modernity which corresponds to the commodification of knowledge and contemporary knowledge which could be labeled as the emancipation of knowledge. Mihály Szívós analyzed institutional functioning from a sociological point of view, raising questions about the efficiency of scientific grant applications. The paper highlighted paradoxes in scientific research that can be grasped by oppositions like conservation and innovation, existing experimental capacities and new ideas, and interests inside and outside science. Paul Ertl investigated restrictions that endanger the freedom of scientific research all over the world. He identified four aspects in this regard: political, societal, economic, and emergency restrictions. Relying on Foucault’s approach, th talk proposed new forms of public discussion. Csaba Olay gave an overview of the tradition of Humboldt’s concept of Bildung and his idea of university-based thereupon.