Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

About Us

Ryszard Praszkier

Ryszard Praszkier (Poland 2017, 2018, 2019) is a researcher at the Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw and a lecturer at the Polish Academy of the Psychology of Leadership. He is interested in the properties of social networks that support profound, peaceful social transitions – the cases of the Polish underground Solidarity and the American Civil Rights Movement. He worked as an international staff training director for Ashoka, Innovators for the Public for over 16 years. During the 1980s, he participated in the Polish underground peaceful Solidarity movement, e.g. publicized under a false name an illegal manual for Solidarity activists “How to survive police interrogation.” He was a consultant for Solidarity candidates for the first free elections in 1989; in the early 1990’s was a co-founder of several grassroots NGO’s and still is on Board of some of them

Topics: What Future Leaders Need to Harness Chaos into Order? What makes Profound and Peaceful Social Transitions? A Case of Solidarity: The Polish Underground Movement

The question arises what sort of new leadership is required to successfully navigate through the “Chaordic Era.” Especially that this new ambience is not only scary, but also provides new opportunities. On one hand, the traditional top-down management stifles potentials embedded “at the bottom of the pyramid,” by disabling bottom-up creativity and initiatives. Moreover, the typical A to B logical thinking fails vis-à-vis the improbable and improbable emergences on the market. Especially that the new milieu is vague and unpredictable. On the other hand, there are possible advantages from the “new chaordic era.”: the free interactions (often seemingly chaotic) are a condition for augmenting creativity, so much desired for being competitive on the market. Also, the new, creative and adaptive systems may be successful only if the relationships are based on trust and cooperation (i.e. – on social capital). This indicates a new kind of leadership, which involves the knack of harnessing chaos into order, allowing people to take co-initiative, having trust and patience to leave a free space for others – not knowing in advance what will pop up; also building social capital, so that people thrive in a trustful and cooperative environment. Finally, this means a high tolerance to ambiguity vis-à-vis the uncertainties and unpredictable environment. The research will focus on analyzing the new milieu and drawing conclusions as for the requirements for the new kind of leadership. What sort of leaders’ characteristics would match the “new chaordic era”? How  to train young leaders to master these required traits? Also: is it possible to shape the new leadership requirements into tangible parameters?  The research will reflect on the possible measurements, providing some guidelines for future studies.